Partial Settlement
Direct copyright; vicarious; contributory (consolidates Alter/Sancton; with Basbanes)
Vicarious; contributory; DMCA 1202(b)(1); 1201(a)(1)(A)
DMCA 1202(b)(1)/(b)(3) on appeal; state law
On Appeal
Direct copyright; state law
Direct copyright; vicarious; DMCA 1202(b)(1)/(b)(3); state law (consolidates Tremblay, Silverman, Chabon)
Direct copyright; contributory infringement; DMCA 1202(a)(1)/(b)(1)/(b)(3); state law (consolidates Chabon, Farnsworth, Huckabee)
Direct copyright; DMCA 1202(a)/(b); Lanham Act; unfair comp.; trademark dilution
Direct copyright; inducement; DMCA 1202(a)/(b)(1); Lanham Act; state law
Direct copyright; vicarious; contributory; DMCA 1202(b)(1)/(b)(3); Lanham Act (consolidates Daily News, CIR)
Direct copyright (tentative settlement)
GEMA sued OpenAI for copyright infringement of song lyrics of nine well-known German songs (including 'Atemlos', 'Männer', 'Über den Wolken') used to train GPT-4 and GPT-4o. The court ruled on 11 November 2025 largely i…
Frequently asked questions
Is AI training fair use?
Courts are still deciding. Bartz v. Anthropic (Alsup, J., N.D. Cal. 2025) bifurcated the question: training on legitimately acquired books may be fair use; downloading pirated copies is not. Thomson Reuters v. Ross found training a directly competing product was not fair use.
Which fair-use factors matter most for AI?
Corpus provenance (licensed vs. scraped vs. pirated), transformativeness of model outputs, and market substitution effects on licensing markets are the most influential factors in early AI rulings.
Browse the full database
This page is a curated slice of the AI Lawsuit Tracker. For the complete picture, see all 159 cases, defendants by company, or the latest rulings.