Active
| Metric | Perplexity | Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Total AI-related cases on file | 6 | 14 |
| Pending / active | 6 | 7 |
| Settled | 0 | 1 |
| Decided | 0 | 0 |
| Dismissed | 0 | 0 |
Total counts reflect AI-related actions against the company across our database (including related entities, consolidated proceedings, and cases where the company is a co-defendant). The case lists below show the primary-defendant docket; bucket totals (pending/settled/decided/dismissed) reflect cases with explicit status fields and may sum to less than the total.
Perplexity — 6 primary-defendant cases (6)
First AI copyright lawsuit in Italy.
Direct copyright; vicarious; contributory; Lanham Act
Direct copyright; vicarious; contributory; Lanham Act
Direct copyright; Lanham Act false designation
Direct copyright; vicarious; contributory; Lanham Act (false designation, trademark)
Anthropic — 8 primary-defendant cases (8)
Active
Direct copyright; vicarious; contributory; DMCA 1202(b)(1)/(b)(3)
Direct copyright (tentative settlement)
Direct copyright (multi-defendant)
Direct copyright (8-defendant)
Direct copyright; vicarious; contributory; DMCA 1202(b)
Active
Plaintiffs, authors who opted out of the Bartz v.
Frequently asked: Perplexity vs. Anthropic
How many AI lawsuits does Perplexity face?
Perplexity is currently named in 6 AI-related lawsuits tracked here — 6 pending/active, 0 settled, 0 decided, 0 dismissed. The list is verified weekly from public dockets.
How many AI lawsuits does Anthropic face?
Anthropic is currently named in 14 AI-related lawsuits tracked here — 7 pending/active, 1 settled, 0 decided, 0 dismissed.
Where do these case counts come from?
Counts are pulled from AI Lawsuit Tracker's case database, verified weekly against public dockets (PACER, CourtListener, and equivalent international sources). Each individual case page links to the underlying primary source.
See also: All Perplexity lawsuits · All Anthropic lawsuits · Browse all comparisons