Trial in progress — Day 4 Trial started Apr 27, 2026 Last verified: Apr 30, 2026

Musk v. Altman — Trial Tracker

Day-by-day coverage of the Musk v. Altman et al. trial in N.D. Cal. (Oakland) before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Trial commenced April 27, 2026; evidence expected to close by mid-May with deliberations wrapping the week of May 18, 2026.

🏛️ N.D. Cal. (Oakland)· Case No. 4:24-cv-04722-YGR· Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers· Filed Aug 5, 2024

Current status

Trial began Monday, April 27, 2026 in Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers's Oakland courtroom. Nine jurors were seated the first day, and Elon Musk took the stand on the second and third days of trial. As of April 30, 2026, the case is on Day 4. Evidence is expected to run roughly three weeks; the parties have told the court they expect deliberations to wrap by May 21, 2026.

One critical mechanic to keep in mind: under Judge Gonzalez Rogers's March 31, 2026 equity-jurisdiction ruling, the jury's verdict on liability is advisory only. The judge will issue the binding decision herself. That ruling also barred punitive damages, leaving compensatory and equitable relief on the table.

Sources: Reuters, The New York Times, Bloomberg Law (subscription).

Damages math

Prayer for relief
$150B
As pleaded by Musk
Expert calc
~$134B
$109B OpenAI + $25B Microsoft
Punitives
Barred
Equity-jurisdiction ruling, Mar 31

Pretrial rulings that shaped the trial

Equity-jurisdiction order — punitives barred, jury advisory

Mar 31, 2026 · Gonzalez Rogers, J.

Holding: The court determined that the breach-of-fiduciary-duty and unjust-enrichment claims sit in equity. As a result, the jury's verdict on liability is advisory, the judge will issue the binding decision, and punitive damages are not available.

Case proceeded to jury trial after motion-to-dismiss survival

Jan 7, 2026 · Gonzalez Rogers, J.

Holding: The court allowed core claims to survive to trial, including allegations that Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI engaged in a scheme to convert OpenAI's nonprofit mission to for-profit benefit, with Microsoft alleged as a knowing recipient.

Witness list reported in court filings

Witnesses publicly identified across the parties' pretrial filings and reporting include:

  • Elon Musk — testified Apr 28–29, 2026 (plaintiff's case in chief)
  • Sam Altman — OpenAI CEO; expected adverse witness
  • Greg Brockman — OpenAI co-founder; expected adverse witness
  • Ilya Sutskever — OpenAI co-founder; expected witness
  • Mira Murati — former OpenAI CTO; deposition central to Microsoft's "kept in the dark" defense
  • Satya Nadella — Microsoft CEO; expected for the Microsoft defense
  • Amy Hood — Microsoft CFO; expected for the Microsoft defense
  • Kevin Scott — Microsoft CTO; expected for the Microsoft defense
  • Stuart Russell — UC Berkeley AI scientist; reported as a Musk-side expert

Witness order is set by the parties and may shift day to day. Sources: GeekWire; New York Times trial coverage.

Day-by-day log

  • Apr 27, 2026 · Day 1
    Jury selection — 9 jurors seated
    Voir dire concluded with nine jurors empaneled in Oakland. Court reminded counsel that the jury's liability verdict is advisory under the March 31 equity-jurisdiction ruling.
  • Apr 28, 2026 · Day 2
    Musk takes the stand
    Direct examination of Elon Musk by lead trial counsel Steven Molo (MoloLamken LLP). Testimony covered Musk's early funding of OpenAI and the disputed promises around its nonprofit mission.
  • Apr 29, 2026 · Day 3
    Cross-examination of Musk
    Cross by OpenAI lead trial counsel William Savitt (Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz). Key exchanges focused on Musk's own AI ventures and the structure of OpenAI's capped-profit subsidiary.
  • Apr 30, 2026 · Day 4
    Plaintiff's case continues
    Plaintiff witnesses expected to follow Musk. Court is in session.
  • Week of May 4, 2026
    OpenAI defense case (expected)
    Altman, Brockman, and Sutskever expected to testify. Reporting indicates Murati's deposition will be played for the Microsoft "kept-in-the-dark" defense.
  • Week of May 11, 2026
    Microsoft defense case (expected)
    Nadella, Hood, and Scott expected to testify on Microsoft's deal structure and lack of insight into OpenAI's nonprofit-to-for-profit conversion.
  • ~May 21, 2026
    Deliberations and verdict (target)
    Parties have indicated to the court they expect closings and deliberations by the week of May 18. The jury's verdict will be advisory; the binding decision rests with Judge Gonzalez Rogers.

Daily log updated from public reporting and court calendar entries. Schedule may shift.

Counsel of record

Musk lead trial counsel
Steven F. Molo — MoloLamken LLP
OpenAI lead trial counsel
William Savitt — Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Microsoft trial counsel
Reported as a team led from Microsoft's regular outside counsel; specific lead not yet on the public docket of trial appearances

Press coverage

FAQ

Is the jury's verdict binding?

No. Under Judge Gonzalez Rogers's March 31, 2026 ruling, the case proceeds in the court's equity jurisdiction. The jury's verdict on liability is advisory; the judge will issue the binding decision after the jury returns.

Can Musk recover punitive damages?

No. The same March 31, 2026 ruling that placed the case in equity also barred punitive damages. Compensatory and equitable relief remain available.

What is Microsoft's defense?

Reporting describes Microsoft's defense as a "kept in the dark" theory: that Microsoft was not party to the alleged scheme to convert OpenAI's nonprofit mission and did not have insight into the disputed governance changes. The deposition testimony of former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati is reported to be central to this defense.

How long is the trial expected to last?

The parties have told the court to expect roughly three weeks of evidence followed by deliberations, with closing arguments and jury deliberations during the week of May 18, 2026. Schedules can slip.