Active Last verified: Apr 25, 2026

Doe, et al. v. Github, Inc., et al.

Doe programmers sued GitHub, OpenAI, and related entities, claiming defendants removed or altered copyright management information from plaintiffs' open-source code uploaded to GitHub repositories when training AI models like Copilot.[1][2][3][4] The case involves Section 1202 of the DMCA and is at the interlocutory appeal stage in the Ninth Circuit (No. 24-7700), filed December 23, 2024, following district court proceedings in Doe v. GitHub, No. 4:22-cv-06823-JST, where some DMCA claims survived dismissal.[1][2][3][6] Plaintiffs seek class-action status and $9 billion in statutory damages, with briefing ongoing including an amicus brief from IP professors supporting defendants' view that Section 1202 applies only to identical copies.[2][3]

🏛️ 9th Cir.· Case No. 24-7700· Filed Dec 23, 2024

Summary

Doe programmers sued GitHub, OpenAI, and related entities, claiming defendants removed or altered copyright management information from plaintiffs' open-source code uploaded to GitHub repositories when training AI models like Copilot.[1][2][3][4] The case involves Section 1202 of the DMCA and is at the interlocutory appeal stage in the Ninth Circuit (No. 24-7700), filed December 23, 2024, following district court proceedings in Doe v. GitHub, No. 4:22-cv-06823-JST, where some DMCA claims survived dismissal.[1][2][3][6] Plaintiffs seek class-action status and $9 billion in statutory damages, with briefing ongoing including an amicus brief from IP professors supporting defendants' view that Section 1202 applies only to identical copies.[2][3]

Case details

Court
9th Cir.
Docket number
24-7700
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Status
Active

This case was added to AI Lawsuit Tracker via our automated docket monitoring. Multiple verification gates and an LLM relevance check confirmed it as AI/ML-related before publishing. How we keep it accurate →

Spotted an error? corrections@ailawsuittracker.com