Active Last verified: Apr 25, 2026

Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp.

Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, and Jane Doe 3 sue X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC, alleging the company's Grok AI generated child sexual abuse material using their likenesses without permission. The class action complaint asserts claims including production of illegal AI-generated CSAM and seeks a jury trial in the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs, including minors, claim severe harm from xAI's knowing release of Grok's image-generation features capable of sexualized content.[1][2]

🏛️ NDCA· Case No. 5:26-cv-02246· Filed Mar 16, 2026

Summary

Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, and Jane Doe 3 sue X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC, alleging the company's Grok AI generated child sexual abuse material using their likenesses without permission. The class action complaint asserts claims including production of illegal AI-generated CSAM and seeks a jury trial in the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs, including minors, claim severe harm from xAI's knowing release of Grok's image-generation features capable of sexualized content.[1][2]

Case details

Court
NDCA
Docket number
5:26-cv-02246
Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Status
Active

This case was added to AI Lawsuit Tracker via our automated docket monitoring. Multiple verification gates and an LLM relevance check confirmed it as AI/ML-related before publishing. How we keep it accurate →

Spotted an error? corrections@ailawsuittracker.com

More cases against xAI

See all →
X.AI LLC v. Bonta
9th Cir. ·Filed Mar 17, 2026
Active
DOE v. X.AI Corp.
NDCA ·Filed Jan 23, 2026
Active
St. Clair v. X.AI Holdings Corp.
SDNY ·Filed Jan 15, 2026
Active
X.AI LLC v. St Clair
NDTX ·Filed Jan 15, 2026
Active